<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mathematics &#8211; science.maelbathfield.net</title>
	<atom:link href="https://science.maelbathfield.net/en/tag/mathematics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://science.maelbathfield.net</link>
	<description>Epistemology and philosophy of physics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2021 19:17:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.2</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>The Arrow argument and Zeno&#8217;s dialectic</title>
		<link>https://science.maelbathfield.net/en/2021/01/06/835/</link>
					<comments>https://science.maelbathfield.net/en/2021/01/06/835/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maël]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2021 12:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Project of paper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immobility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mathematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zeno]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://science.maelbathfield.net/?p=835</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new interpretation, closer to the original Greek text, of the &#8216;Flying Arrow&#8217; argument will be proposed. The complex dialectic formed by the 4 arguments concerning motion will be exposed. Source of illustration image: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Z%C3%A9non_d%27%C3%89l%C3%A9e#/media/Fichier:Zeno_of_Elea_Tibaldi_or_Carducci_Escorial.jpg]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
 <p> A new interpretation, closer to the original Greek text, of the &#8216;Flying Arrow&#8217; argument will be proposed. </p> 



 <p> The complex dialectic formed by the 4 arguments concerning motion will be exposed. </p> 



<p style="font-size:12px">Source of illustration image: <a href="https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Z%C3%A9non_d%27%C3%89l%C3%A9e#/media/Fichier:Zeno_of_Elea_Tibaldi_or_Carducci_Escorial.jpg">https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Z%C3%A9non_d%27%C3%89l%C3%A9e#/media/Fichier:Zeno_of_Elea_Tibaldi_or_Carducci_Escorial.jpg</a> </p> 
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://science.maelbathfield.net/en/2021/01/06/835/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>History of mathematics and Zeno&#8217;s paradoxes</title>
		<link>https://science.maelbathfield.net/en/2020/03/30/391/</link>
					<comments>https://science.maelbathfield.net/en/2020/03/30/391/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maël]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2020 11:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Project of paper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immobility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mathematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zeno]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://science.maelbathfield.net/?p=391</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Draft article in response to the article &#8220;When Science Confronts Philosophy: Three Case Studies&#8221; by Eric Dietrich: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10516-019-09472-9. It seems to me that including the case of the paradoxes of Zeno is not really wise compared to my own work (which E. Dietrich does not seem to have read) Connections between mathematics and the paradoxes [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
 <p> Draft article in response to the article &#8220;When Science Confronts Philosophy: Three Case Studies&#8221; by Eric Dietrich: <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10516-019-09472-9" target="_blank">https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10516-019-09472-9</a>. It seems to me that including the case of the paradoxes of Zeno is not really wise compared to my own work (which E. Dietrich does not seem to have read) </p> 



 <p> Connections between mathematics and the paradoxes of Zeno&#8217;s movement will then be examined in great detail. </p> 



<p style="font-size:12px" class="has-text-color has-secondary-color">Source of illustration image: <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.futura-sciences.com/sciences/actualites/mecanique-quantique-effet-zenon-nouvelle-preuve-cette-etrangete-quantique-60252/" target="_blank">https://www.futura-sciences.com/sciences/actualites/mecanique-quantique-effet-zenon-nouvelle-preuve-cette-etrangete-quantique-60252/</a> </p> 
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://science.maelbathfield.net/en/2020/03/30/391/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
