<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Instantaneous velocity &#8211; science.maelbathfield.net</title>
	<atom:link href="https://science.maelbathfield.net/en/tag/instantaneous-velocity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://science.maelbathfield.net</link>
	<description>Epistemology and philosophy of physics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2022 09:01:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.2</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Classical Mechanics and States of Motion</title>
		<link>https://science.maelbathfield.net/en/2022/09/18/387/</link>
					<comments>https://science.maelbathfield.net/en/2022/09/18/387/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maël]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2022 10:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Project of paper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Classical mechanics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Instantaneous velocity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motion]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://science.maelbathfield.net/?p=387</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The philosophical (even metaphysical) consequences of the position defended in my first article, thus the philosophical problems posed by the notion of &#8216;instantaneous velocity&#8217; in the framework of classical physics will be examined, and a solution will be proposed. A first version of this article, entitled &#8220;In Defense of the Unavoidable Existence of States of [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
 <p> The philosophical (even metaphysical) consequences of the position defended in <a href="https://science.maelbathfield.net/en/2020/01/15/foundations-of-science-1/">my first article</a>, thus the philosophical problems posed by the notion of &#8216;instantaneous velocity&#8217; in the framework of classical physics will be examined, and a solution will be proposed. </p> 



 <p> A first version of this article, entitled &#8220;In Defense of the Unavoidable Existence of States of Motion&#8221;, has already been submitted to the editors of the journal <em><a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://journal.philsci.org/" target="_blank">Philosophy of Science</a></em>: it was refused for fairly well justified reasons, and also the reviewers did constructive criticism. As a result, the argumentative structure of this second version has been profoundly modified. </p> 



 <p> The second version (entitled &#8220;Why Classical Mechanics Needs the Existence of States of Motion in Order to Be Fully Consistent&#8221;) was then submitted to the journal <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.springer.com/journal/11229" target="_blank">Synthese</a>: the reviewers again gave rather constructive criticism, but the main objection was that it was not a &#8216;hot topic&#8217; to be published in this journal. The substance of my statement was only criticized on a few points of detail. A third version (again with a change of title) is therefore in preparation… </p> 



<p class="has-secondary-color has-text-color" style="font-size:12px">Source of illustration image: <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="http://res-nlp.univ-lemans.fr/NLP_C_M01_G01/co/Contenu%2031.html" target="_blank">http://res-nlp.univ-lemans.fr/NLP_C_M01_G01/co/Contenu%2031.html</a> </p> 
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://science.maelbathfield.net/en/2022/09/18/387/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
